Final Report by Celsius Examiner Criticizes Crypto LenderTable of Contents
Final Report by Celsius Examiner Criticizes Crypto Lender
By CoinUnited.io Research Team
3 min read
According to Examiner Shoba Pillay's 689-page final report issued on Tuesday, Celsius, which allowed users to earn yield on their coins by lending them out, was unable to effectively maintain its assets and liabilities and attempted to remove misrepresentations made by Mashinsky in public remarks.
Despite a deepening liquidity shortage since May, the company continued to portray an optimistic financial image to its consumers, the study stated. However, staff described the firm internally as a "sinking ship" with no plan. Furthermore, Celsius's use of client assets as collateral for loans to fill in holes in its balance sheet and lack of transparency around purchases of its token CEL were both red flags.
According to the investigation, "behind the scenes, Celsius ran its company in a dramatically different manner from how it advertised itself to clients in every key aspect."
The results come as state and federal officials in the United States continue their investigations into Celsius while the company is in the midst of bankruptcy proceedings. Because to the failure of the Terra blockchain and the subsequent steep drop in crypto values, the firm was forced to file for bankruptcy in July. Several weeks before to declaring for bankruptcy, the lender had frozen withdrawals, protecting itself from its more than 100,000 debtors.
A third-party examiner was brought in at the end of September to look at Celsius's operations, particularly whether or not multiple user account types were being mixed together.
Even though staff had been discussing how the CEL token should be worth zero throughout 2022, Mashinsky assured consumers on many occasions that the token's value matched the firm's value. Even though the terms of service for Celsius state that the user's rights of ownership have been transferred to the firm as of March 2020, Celsius and its administrators assured consumers that their deposited cryptoassets were "your assets" and would be restored in the case of bankruptcy.
The most up-to-date study looked upon Celsius's own acquisitions of CEL with customer and outside money sources. A minimum of $558 million was discovered to have been spent by the lender on its own token, with the full scale of the CEL market manipulation being kept secret from clients.
According to the study, Celsius often intervened to prevent CEL price declines it blamed on Mashinsky's sales of huge sums of his personal CEL holdings. Mashinsky sold at least 25 million CEL tokens between 2018 and when Celsius filed for bankruptcy, earning at least $68.7 million from these transactions, while co-founder S. Daniel Leon sold at least 2.6 million CEL tokens for at least $9.74 million, according to the study.
After being asked for comment, Mashinsky, who left Celsius in September, did not provide one right away.
Celsius also promised its assets high returns by putting their money in secured retail and institutional loans. According to the research, the firm started making riskier investments in 2020 and 2021 when the market was booming in an attempt to attract more consumers by giving loans that were not fully secured or were unsecured in order to charge higher interest rates. According to the research, by June 2021, up to a third of Celsius's institutional loan portfolio was completely unsecured.
According to the study, Celsius's internal accounting procedures made it difficult for the examiner to assess the company's financial health. The bank kept its financial records in a combination of Excel spreadsheets and the accounting software packages QuickBooks and NetSuite.
Celsius had "severe tax compliance problems," according to the auditor, because it didn't hire a tax manager until 2021 and didn't set up the appropriate processes to collect and remit payments. Also affected were the company's Bitcoin mining activities, which racked up electricity bills of $14 million and tax debts of up to $23 million.
According to the study, Celsius did not assemble its first risk management team until 2021, when it employed four personnel. The new team started implementing "stop-gap" measures before introducing permanent ones in 2022. Early in the year, in the month of November to be exact, Pillay submitted a 302-page interim report detailing Celsius's liquidity flow issues and the lack of funds in the company's Custody accounts.
Despite a deepening liquidity shortage since May, the company continued to portray an optimistic financial image to its consumers, the study stated. However, staff described the firm internally as a "sinking ship" with no plan. Furthermore, Celsius's use of client assets as collateral for loans to fill in holes in its balance sheet and lack of transparency around purchases of its token CEL were both red flags.
According to the investigation, "behind the scenes, Celsius ran its company in a dramatically different manner from how it advertised itself to clients in every key aspect."
The results come as state and federal officials in the United States continue their investigations into Celsius while the company is in the midst of bankruptcy proceedings. Because to the failure of the Terra blockchain and the subsequent steep drop in crypto values, the firm was forced to file for bankruptcy in July. Several weeks before to declaring for bankruptcy, the lender had frozen withdrawals, protecting itself from its more than 100,000 debtors.
A third-party examiner was brought in at the end of September to look at Celsius's operations, particularly whether or not multiple user account types were being mixed together.
Even though staff had been discussing how the CEL token should be worth zero throughout 2022, Mashinsky assured consumers on many occasions that the token's value matched the firm's value. Even though the terms of service for Celsius state that the user's rights of ownership have been transferred to the firm as of March 2020, Celsius and its administrators assured consumers that their deposited cryptoassets were "your assets" and would be restored in the case of bankruptcy.
The most up-to-date study looked upon Celsius's own acquisitions of CEL with customer and outside money sources. A minimum of $558 million was discovered to have been spent by the lender on its own token, with the full scale of the CEL market manipulation being kept secret from clients.
According to the study, Celsius often intervened to prevent CEL price declines it blamed on Mashinsky's sales of huge sums of his personal CEL holdings. Mashinsky sold at least 25 million CEL tokens between 2018 and when Celsius filed for bankruptcy, earning at least $68.7 million from these transactions, while co-founder S. Daniel Leon sold at least 2.6 million CEL tokens for at least $9.74 million, according to the study.
After being asked for comment, Mashinsky, who left Celsius in September, did not provide one right away.
Celsius also promised its assets high returns by putting their money in secured retail and institutional loans. According to the research, the firm started making riskier investments in 2020 and 2021 when the market was booming in an attempt to attract more consumers by giving loans that were not fully secured or were unsecured in order to charge higher interest rates. According to the research, by June 2021, up to a third of Celsius's institutional loan portfolio was completely unsecured.
According to the study, Celsius's internal accounting procedures made it difficult for the examiner to assess the company's financial health. The bank kept its financial records in a combination of Excel spreadsheets and the accounting software packages QuickBooks and NetSuite.
Celsius had "severe tax compliance problems," according to the auditor, because it didn't hire a tax manager until 2021 and didn't set up the appropriate processes to collect and remit payments. Also affected were the company's Bitcoin mining activities, which racked up electricity bills of $14 million and tax debts of up to $23 million.
According to the study, Celsius did not assemble its first risk management team until 2021, when it employed four personnel. The new team started implementing "stop-gap" measures before introducing permanent ones in 2022. Early in the year, in the month of November to be exact, Pillay submitted a 302-page interim report detailing Celsius's liquidity flow issues and the lack of funds in the company's Custody accounts.
Latest Crypto Trading Articles & Market Insights
See All Articles
Stay ahead with the newest tutorials, price predictions, and trading strategies across top crypto and CFD markets.
PayPal USD (PYUSD) Price Prediction: Can PYUSD Reach $30 in 2026?
17 JUN 2025
Nuburu, Inc. (BURU) Price Prediction: Can BURU Reach $1.8 in 2026?
11 AUG 2025Biggest Primech Holdings Ltd. (PMEC) Trading Opportunities in 2025: You Shouldn’t Miss.
24 APR 2026The Best Trading Platforms for Primech Holdings Ltd. (PMEC)
24 APR 2026
The Fundamentals of Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL): What Every Trader Needs to Know
24 APR 2026Maximizing Profits with 2000x Leverage on Primech Holdings Ltd. (PMEC): A Comprehensive Guide.
24 APR 2026Trending Crypto Articles: Top Coins Making Moves Right Now
See All Articles
Explore expert insights and trading guides on today’s most active and talked-about cryptocurrencies.
PayPal USD (PYUSD) Price Prediction: Can PYUSD Reach $30 in 2026?
17 JUN 2025Nuburu, Inc. (BURU) Price Prediction: Can BURU Reach $1.8 in 2026?
11 AUG 2025Biggest Primech Holdings Ltd. (PMEC) Trading Opportunities in 2025: You Shouldn’t Miss.
24 APR 2026The Best Trading Platforms for Primech Holdings Ltd. (PMEC)
24 APR 2026The Fundamentals of Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL): What Every Trader Needs to Know
24 APR 2026Maximizing Profits with 2000x Leverage on Primech Holdings Ltd. (PMEC): A Comprehensive Guide.
24 APR 2026